I woke up this morning
and the sky was falling
I cried, because
it was bleeding, too
(and I wondered what happened to God
to make him shed such painful tears)
but they said it was only a sunrise
and I was being too loud.
I asked why it was that solar rays
ran in rivulets throughout
prominent moments of time
(like wars and funerals and departures
and those heavy events we pretend never happened)
but they ignored my cries
and the sunbeams that were entangled in my feet
and trailing behind me,
showing all the wrong turns I made
(they wouldn't see my limbs
raw, ragged, from running
with no destination in mind)
I guess I was a little too loud-
they can only hear you
when you're completely silent
and, by then, it's too late
because the sun has already set
(the opposite of a sunrise,
but they each have the same affect
because they both signal an end
of everything you've come to know)
it's too late for me, I think
God knows, too, and he weeps for me
bits of sky and bleeding sunrise
I'm growing quiet as I stop to nurse the universe
(already dead)
and it's only now they begin to hear
nothing
except the still
that comes when you're forsaken
(but they only hear nothing
because they never took the time
to heed my cries
or hold up the sky)
it's too late for me
The way this strife is presented is by the accompanying parenthetical phrases. It was quite a powerful tool to use here as it both separates and showcases the realities of the speaker. To create an abstract sense of awareness can be quite difficult, but with these pieces of sentence structure a writer is able to help distinguish between what is happening and what is perceived by the speaker. Aside from that is the richness of inner-dialog which is propagated by this type of construction - a wise choice indeed.
I do always bring question to making the emphasis by the font and not by the function of the words. You have clearly made such a beautiful set of mixing of dialog and action, yet it seems to be filtered unnecessarily by the addition of a different text. Besides that presentation, the words in italics were quite fantastic to read through - making this whole argument a bit frivolous in the end.
Some of these abstract piece tend to have a less concrete ending. A lot of times they refer to these irrational types as they oppose a normal structure. What is interesting is the abstract nature of finding the balance between both dialogues is represented by this stylistic choice.
Overall it has a lot of character and a neat style to present a full spectrum of ideas. This was a very nicely done piece - thanks for sharing.
- Ben M. Walls
The Artist has requested Critique on this Artwork
Please sign up or login to post a critique.